Leiden university and university of amsterdam, the netherlands. This volume gives a theoretical account of the problem of analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse. The pragmadialectical approach frans van eemeren, rob grootendorst, frans h. Apr 23, 2015 frans van eemeren professor in the department of speech communication, argumentation theory and rhetoric at the university of amsterdam delivering a talk at wheres your argument. Van crucial concepts in argumentation theory is a collection of essays that discuss a series of important issues in the study of argumentation. Strategic maneuvering eemeren major reference works. Argumentation is the first introductory textbook of this kind. Francisca snoeck henkemans, bart verheij and jean wagemans, who are a coherent and prominent writing team whose expertise covers the whole field. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse frans h. Dear readers, in may 2011, frans van eemeren retired from the university of amsterdam. This book concentrates on argumentation as it emerges in ordinary discourse, whether the discourse is institutionalized or strictly informal. Keeping in touch with pragmadialectics is written to honor frans van eemeren and his work in the field of argumentation theory on the occasion of his retirement. Create marketing content that resonates with prezi video.
Frans van eemeren universiteit van amsterdam academia. Argumentative indicators in discourse a pragmadialectical. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected. Exploring argumentative contexts edited by frans h. Pragmadialectical approach to argumentation theory model of a critical discussion critical discussion and the identification of fallacies argumentative discourse analysis as resolutionoriented reconstruction strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse different kinds of argumentative practices prototypical argumentative patterns goaloriented argumentation descriptive and normative. Crucial concepts in argumentation theory eemeren, frans h. He is noted for his pragmadialectics theory, an argumentation theory which he developed with rob grootendorst from the early 1980s onwards. Empirical research concerning the pragmadialectical discussion rules, and more on. Join facebook to connect with hans van eemeren and others you may know. Studies in pragma dialectics download ebook pdf, epub. Van eemeren and rob grootendorst thanks to hamblins book fallacies 1970, it is now common knowledge that the standard treatment of fallacies suffers from serious theoretical and practical defects. First published 2004 printed in the united states of america. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Unlimited viewing of the articlechapter pdf and any associated supplements.
Van eemeren, grootendorst and snoeck henkemans, the lead authors, have coordinated the work of a truly international team of scholars drawn from among the chief contributors to theory and research in argumentation studies. Strategic maneuvering refers to the arguers continual efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being reasonable. The volume contains 17 contributions from teams of authors consisting of a. The result of this remarkable collaboration is a comprehensive survey of the subject, set clearly in historical context. Snoeck henkemans this volume identifies and analyses english words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of. In strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse, frans h. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragmadialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goaldirected communicative activity and dialectically as part of a.
Frans van eemeren, universiteit van amsterdam, speech communication, argumentation theory and rhetoric department, faculty member. Fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring1 frans h. Frans van eemeren professor in the department of speech communication, argumentation theory and rhetoric at the university of amsterdam delivering a talk at wheres your argument. Eca frans van eemeren prize for outstanding student paper an international panel of leading argumentation scholars, chaired by professor chris w. Developments in argumentation theory frans h van eemeren and rob grootendorst, university of amsterdam abstract in this paper, a survey is provided of the state of the art in argumentation theory. He has published numerous books and papers, including. In fallacies and judgments of reasonableness, frans h. Tindale, will act as the jury for the eca frans van eemeren prize, with the aim of selecting an outstanding student paper in each eca edition. Crucial concepts from the theory of argumentation are systematically discussed and explained with the help of examples from reallife discourse and.
Pragmadialectics, or pragmadialectical theory, developed by frans h. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. It is an argumentation theory that is used to analyze and evaluate argumentation in actual practice. Frans hendrik van eemeren born 7 april 1946, helmond is a dutch scholar, professor in the.
Informal logic, the formal theory of fallacies, formal dialectics. The essays describe the concepts that are crucial to argumentational research and the various ways these concepts have been approached. After placing argumentation in a communicative perspective, and then discussing the fallacies that occur when certain rules of communication are violated, the authors offer an alternative to both the linguisticallyinspired descriptive and logicallyinspired normative approaches to. Analysis and evaluation routledge communication 97818225077. Frans hendrik van eemeren born 7 april 1946, helmond is a dutch scholar, professor in the department of speech communication, argumentation theory and rhetoric at the university of amsterdam. Snoeck henkemans this volume identifies and analyses english words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse. A pragmadialectical study argumentation library, and fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. The experimental studies they carried out duringmore than ten years start from the pragmadialectical theory of argumentation.
939 200 445 347 1455 283 936 964 386 376 792 318 950 801 708 910 676 189 320 999 1118 1274 481 661 447 386 1434 508 1448 514 1120 731 810